Pie’s version of this post is below
As you may already know, ACP has decided to continue their attack on the Nacho Empire. We have the Crystal Warriors & Ice Warriors as allies just in case ACP really is serious about continuing their attack. My question for ACP is this. Why is your army continuing the attack on the Nacho Empire? Bob’s post did not mention any reason behind it. His post simply said ACP’s going to continue with the war. Is ACP doing this just to attack an innocent army because they have the power to? If so then this wouldn’t be the first time. The United States Military could definitely take over Sudan though they would just look like jack asses in the process. This is present day evidence of ACP’s corruption. The corruption is returning to ACP with Boomer, Oagal, and Bob as leaders. For now we will continue with our Training Sessions and Practice Battles until ACP schedules an invasion or Battle.
~50
Pie: Once again the Evil Empire has struck.
All ACP is a bunch of hypocrites. How you are asking? A few months back, we were at war with IW. IW surrendered, but we were questioning if we should accept the surrender. ACP stepped in, and their leaders (I.e Boomer, Matre, Dry), said that you have to respect a surrender. And today, Dry is the one who is chanting for continuing this war.
So I hope that ACP continues this war on us. Just makes the Nacho Empire even more right.
~*Pie1530*
ps. Time to destroy the Evil Empire *plays Star Wars music*
Pwn: If ACP doesn’t give us any good reasons, we shouldn’t respect their delcaration of war.
Filed under: The Nacho Army |
Nacho Army of Club Penguin 
Ice Warriors are neutral in this war ;(
50: I talked to Icey about it. He hasen’t officially confirmed helping us against ACP though he likely will if the war does continue. The only reason the Ice Warriors were neutral at the beginning is because the word got out early.
Once again the Evil Empire has struck.
All ACP is a bunch of hypocrits. How you are asking? A few months back, we were at war with IW. IW surrendered, but we were questioning if we should accept the surrender. ACP stepped in, and their leaders (I.e Boomer, Matre, Dry), said that you have to respect a surrender. And today, Dry is the one who is chanting for continuing this war.
So I hope that ACP continues this war on us. Just makes the Nacho Empire even more right.
~*Pie1530*
ps. Time to destroy the Evil Empire *plays Star Wars music*
[…] 50: New Post Below https://nachoarmy.net/2010/10/27/a-question-for-acp/ […]
3rd! and ACP needs to stop attacking.
4! YAY
ACP’s kinda sad (ono). Just ignore them. Like I’ve said a million times, how would ACP be important to us?
Oh I don’t know maybe because we want to be number 1?.-.
6th
The reason for war is not glory, self-conquest. No, ACP has enough personal prestige to last a life-time. The reason for war is revenge.
Revenge for invasion, insult, war, in it’s most crude form. You marched into ACP for less a reason than ACP has in fact. ACP is putting the Nachos into their place for trying to destroy ACP ever like, 2 months. While the Nachos marched in, for the 10th time under the reason of ACP not giving you their capital and the server of world’s desire.
If anything you should be asking yourselves why you haven’t surrendered(with actual assets ceded to ACP) yet. Look around, you have NOTHING going for you. CW is hated throughout CP, there is a giant league against you, and your betting your survival on a prayer that Icey will risk his sovereignty for an extra 5% chance of yours.
Give the Last Infantry land, wealth, and other such things and they will leave you alone. It’s just a matter of whether or not you’ll realize that in time.
50: The Nachos declared war on ACP because they were starting to have the majority of the power in armies again. As a Major Army Leader I would never want ACP to have the majority of the power again. As a matter of fact I wouldn’t want any army to possess that much power. I don’t believe ACP taking over CP Armies is 100% intentional though ACP’s leaders are corrupted by the power.
As valid as those points are, when have the Nachos ever continued an attack on ACP when they surrendered?
Acp has never surrendered to the nachos. Except for WWIV. But even then y’know nobody really surrendered there. It just stopped for some reason (ccan’t think of it off the top of my head)
Well I think the 2 times ACP did actually surrender:
1) It was 2009 and RPF was “raided by ACP on Valentines Day” (Probably didn’t really happen), and ACP was invaded by like EVERYONE at the same time. They imedietly surrendered, but because RPF was incharge of the alliance invading ACP we basiclly negotiated a peace. We were headed by Commmando and Commando has that sweat-tooth for keeping ACP alive(WWIII stuff).
2) It was WWIV and you did send them into a depression and humiliation. Which is basicly what ACP wants to happen to you, but they must invade for it to fully happen.
Point is, ACP has never surrendered. 😆
Incorrect.
All the same 50, to spite ACP’s growth in political control of CP they showed no sign of military action. With or without their TEMPORARY control. Most of the wars ACP has been involved in were started by some other power. ACP usually just sits around recruiting or something.
Also, it is not ACP you should be worried about. Look at NW. They are expanding, rapidly. You think ACP is bad because they wont agree to peace? NW have banned RPF ambassadors for asking for an alliance, once, in PC. I doubt you’d get to say anything to Ven about a peace treety if they went to war with you.
50 you live in the old, imperial age. Back when ACP was led by Boomer and just had to be involved in every event that ever took place. Now ACP is only involved in select wars that are, for the most part, started by the enemy.
But the Imperial age is long gone. Now ACP is much more unable to intervien. As for corruption, there is hardly any possible corruption in CP Armies. But to the very little extent it is in it is not corruption, but the beurocracy. The beurocracy makes unfairness, but without the beurocracy, one could never manage an army of such size.
50, you don’t seem to realise the fact that if ACP’s leaders were corrupted with power and that ACP was intentionally taking the majority of the power on CP for itself, they would have tried to destroy and do away with every other major army there is, which has not yet happened and never will.
Instead, you are the corrupted one who thinks he has every right to try to destroy an army and when beaten, you immediately surrender and cower away behind your insulting posts on your site. You are all words 50…
…well… I whould like to win a war against acp for once every time we end up surrendering the surredering to acp makes them stronger and lowers are moral, so next time think of the odds before you take an overly bold move all so remember this is a game……
Well the ACP never surrendered so we dont know (:
May I ask how Josh’s post of the same content as mine was accepted , but mine wasn’t?
Zayer: Suffice to say. Marginal error?
probably because josh isn’t ACP…
“give the last infantry land, wealth, and other such things and they will leave you alone”
#1 blackmail?
#2 wealth? what?
#3 revenge. really. is it me, or did we call war to change the corrupt leadership of acp, and when we gave up and surrendered, you now attack us, almost as if you plan to destroy us?(and here you cry that we were “planning to destroy you” )
not only was that alot of fancy bullshit for “we’re bigger so we’re gonna make sure smaller armies dont f*ck with us” but you make points which either are morally wrong, logically wrong, or some combination of both. please, refrain from making comments as such, when we can see right through it 🙂
No, you phrase it in such a way to say that it is wrong to attack for revenge. It would be like if a bully tried to beat you every other day and, although you almost always won you decided, “Hmmm, maybe it’s a good idea to get this bully to stop attacking me.” But the bully will not listen to reason, so violence must be used. This is the “revenge” on that bully.
Also, what is morally wrong would differ for each of us. For instance, ACP, and everyone that’s ever been in ACP, and everyone that’s ever (truly) allied with ACP, is fine with the ACP leadership. Waging war against a non-exsistant corruption(or atleast gladly accepted) is “morally wrong”, isn’t it?
And yes while it may be fancy for making sure that smaller armies don’t try to invade ACP ever couple weeks, you over simplify it and rephrase it to the point of negativity against ACP. Do you have any idea how often you attack ACP? It’s about time you got punished for it rather than just walking away EVERY time.
As for the terms that I suggest to you, it is not blackmail, it is apeasement. Wealth represents a payment in xats to suplement a ceding of servers.
In conclusion, the Nachos have, for a long, long time “rivaled” ACP. Of course, ACP rarly “rivals” the Nachos back. Destruction however is not prefurable for the Nachos. It is much more prefurable that you are crippled. It would put the Nachos in no position to attack ACP again, but the Nachos do add SOME things to CP Army Culture. They should be left alive, just not in the position to attack anyone.
Nevertheless, the biggest irony is that the ACP Invasion will hit the same time as the Storm hits the Island. It is doubtful you will bare it however, it’s a Class 5 Hurricane hellbent on counter-assult.
Zayer: I see where you’re coming from. Allow me to respond to a few of your points. #1, you claim us to be the bully, when in reality, i don’t see someone half your size being a bully- or the fact that you win “almost every time” doesn’t prove them to be a bully, it may show they’re just a mean person. That is different however, because we are not a mean army. This is CP warfare, and being the number 2/3 army, we would rather call war on bigger armies for challenges and more fun (THE POINT OF CP WARFARE) rather then smaller armies who we beat and win everytime. #2 of course everyone allied with ACP is fine with the leadership, if they weren’t, WHY WOULD THEY BE ALLIES WITH YOU?! “waging war against a non-existent corruption (or a gladly accepted one) is morally wrong, isn’t it? ” i believe that just because everyone goes along with it, doesn’t mean it’s right (peer pressure? it’s called having an opinion, not just agreeing because they’re better then you, so they must be right) #3 As for the simplifying, I agree, we attack you alot, and I agree that you have a right to tell us to back off. Yet, let me ask you. If not you we attack, then what happens? We call war on smaller armies? or even better yet, we make an alliance and completely wipe out other armies? Who else do you propose we call war on- seeing as we rank #2/3 in the top ten, it only fits to call war on #1. Where are we- #4, you propose us to pay xats in supplement of servers. The way I see it, pretty much only owners have xats, and you’re proposing we pay your leaders- despite the fact it is YOUR ARMY who does the invading, fights the battles, and deserves a reward (e.g. servers) while I don’t mind the fact you were looking for other means of payment, paying xats infers only leaders get a reward, which is- you guessed it, morally wrong. So, in conclusion and retort to your conclusion, you say now that you wish to cripple us. We have done nothing wrong, but called war- and warfare is what CP WARFARE IS ALL ABOUT. Your reasons of punishment are we were doing WHAT ALL ARMIES ARE SUPPOSED TO DO- CALL WAR AND HAVE FUN. For you to tell us to back off is one thing, for you to all-around punish or “cripple” us for doing what we’ve always done is just- in-comprehensible to me. While I understand your points and may even agree to one or two, your overall idea of attacking us is out of line. =Zayer=
@ Pwn, and lose all your servers in the process.
Dear God,
All i want is my Freedom. -Mchappy is stuck by lighting- THANKS GOD ^_^
if i was the leader of the nacho army i would just send our allies and our army at once. each allied squad at the acp server and crush them once and for all. i know the nacho army is the best since i got here first i was about to join the acp but NO the the acp is a big failure and there weak i would never join the acp.
this message was just a expression using my imaginative ideas and my mind