Nacho Army of Club Penguin

I’m getting sick of writing already, but I must retaliate.

“Lolwut? Why even bother to make an analysis if you have been retired? If you’re retired you stay out of the army business, retiring is LEAVING the army business. What is the point of being retired if you’re going to make posts like your last one?”

I have left the “army business”, I rarely log on, and don’t come on chat nearly as much as I used to, however, I do consider myself to be an “advisor” of some sorts to the Nachos, so making posts on their site is clearly something that I am well within my rights of doing, being an editor and all. Also the post only took ten-fifteen minutes to write, it’s not like I spent my whole life tolling away on it, if I were to do that, there is no way I would have bothered doing it.

“First of all, that was a training session, and 23 is good for a training session. If you take into note that 3 of our leaders were missing (which you obviously didn’t seeing as you’re taking this from the Nacho’s point of view) then you would realize we did extremely well.  We have been getting 35-40 in all events before that, and Ganger hasn’t even been there most of the time, so yes, we are being consistent, unlike your Nacho leadership.”

Three, out of five of your leaders, wow, awful. And when I say you’re not consistent without Ganger, I mean in a long time-period than a couple of weeks, I mean in a month, and it has been clearly demonstrated numerous times that SWAT is unable to be stable without Ganger. “unlike your Nachos leadership” mfw, we’ve existed for 5-6 years as one of the best armies in CP, your statement is laughable.

“So you’re trying to tell me that if Nachos get 23 it’s considered a bad day…/facepalm. Here is a summary on your last battle:

Today, we battled the Ice Warriors in Round 2 of the tournament. Unfortunately, we were not able to pull out a victory over the IW today. Our tactics were pretty good, but our size couldn’t match what the Ice Warriors had. We were able to maintain a size around 20 Nachos for the battle whereas the Ice Warriors had about 30 to 35 or so soldiers. Overall, we didn’t do too bad”

Lol, on a post, yes, we’re not an army to diminish morale. However, you were not on  chat for the bitter disappointment of the troops, but I guess this is because “you’re taking this from SWAT’s point of view.”

“You’re feeling like an idiot now? Right? How come if this is the year of the Nachos you’ve been at your lowest point + not even been in the top 10 this week? Please stop being delusional.”

We weren’t in the Top 10 because we didn’t give CPAC pics, despite Bluesockwa2 being there at that event, we did then post the pics, and they would have got us within the Top 5 easily. And really, you actually care about CPAC?

Oh, and mfw, you call me  delusional, and yet claim that I am feeling like an idiot, when I’m clearly not, because all your points are flawed.

“SaW did not knock NW site offline to win a war…it’s getting quiet pathetic on what you’ve come up with so far. SaW booted NW site off for the lulz, not to win a war..lol. Secondly, an army that “harbours” SaW? Lolwut? SaW is banned forever on SWAT chat, and he was leader only once for a week. You should probably stay retired instead of embarrassing yourself writing these flawed posts.”

I quite clearly remember little NW’s running around annoyed because SaW, leading DW, who were at WAR with NW had DDOS’d NW’s site. Oh and, please explain why in your last post you said this ” They were jelly over SWAT’s bulk leadership, consisting of SaW, me, Cul, Ganger, Spi (I think?) and Jerry.” if SaW was only leader for a week? Because quite clearly, if he only led for a week, then there would be no reason to put his name here. And, you should probably stop embarrassing yourself instead of writing these flawed posts. 😉

Edit: I just took this 5 min ago https://nachoarmy.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/saw.png At least tell the truth Unk

“LT made ACP drop to their all time low (then) in the top 10. ACP was 5th, because they were getting sizes of 10-15 at each event. ACP was then saved by Mchappy, and that is when acp started to go back to 35-40. However, when Mchappy left, ACP started flopping once more, getting 10-15. That is when you made them surrender, and without LT, that wouldn’t have happened. You got very lucky as well.”

Mfw ACP declared war on us when they were first, and averaging 30-45, and didn’t drop to 5th until during the war. Mfw Mch didn’t do anything, and they were getting that while he was leader too. And of course we would have done that without LT, we were destroying them without LT as it was, LT decided to go recreate itself as always, and try and hijack our war. “You got very lucky as well” Having a fantastic, skilled, leadership is luck? Oh, yes, I forgot, most  of your owners don’t really tend to work for their rank.

“Yet again you make a flaw, SWAT has been hitting 30-35 without Ganger, please do your research. Scroll down and see our event results last week.”

mfw Ganger is on the ranks.

“As CPAC revealed numerous of weeks ago, you’re cheaters.”

You consider that cheating, well, it seems most armies are cheats then. And how exactly do you cheat in armies, unless you use bots, I really don’t consider making some fake pictures “cheating”, just the art of espionage.

“Come back when you’re actually going to make some sense”

This good enough?

-end-

Filed under: The Nacho Army |