Nacho Army of Club Penguin

So, ACP Leader, Bam, made a post declaring Zing to be biased due to his incredibly anti-ACP post that reached Stalinist levels of propaganda. Heh.

No Trotsky or Kamenev here………….

The real truth is, and this may prove to be absolutely shocking for Bam, it does not matter if Zing is biased, as long as he refrains from including this bias in his CPAWM posts, which he successfully managed to do. 

Absolutely everyone is going to biased towards certain things. Take Nick Robinson for example, he’s currently the BBC’s Political Editor. The BBC, being funded by the tax payer, is supposed to be completely politically neutral, and yet many of their employees clearly have ideologies that they support. Nick Robinson while at Oxford University was president of the university’s Conservative Association (a political organisation that supports the UK’s currently ruling Conservative and Unionist Party.) It would be easy to brand Robinson as being biased, but for the most part he is not. It does not matter what someone’s alignments are- as long as they do not influence their work for an organisation that is supposed to be politically neutral. Zing may be a former Nacho – who was fired, might I add – but that does not mean it shows through in his work for CPAC, and anything that he says outside of CPAC is largely irrelevant since it’s not being seen by the masses- this would be a completely different case if he was presenting this as CPAC’s opinion.

Zing’s post was unbiased; throughout the post Zing simply stated facts.

Below is an excerpt of Zing’s post, the sentences marked in green are factual, those in red are opinion.

Only twice in the post did Zing provide his opinion. The first time he merely commented that it was sad that ACP didn’t log on- which is hardly biased against ACP, it simply  shows that Zing would have liked an actual conflict between two sides to have occurred. The second time was when he said that ‘it seems that the ACP for [whatever] reason are simply dodging the Nachos SS.’ This statement is an inference by Zing as to why ACP did not show up, yes, it does paint ACP in a negative light, and it is Zing’s opinion, but it was hardly a major attack on the army.

The only valid complaint I can really see was presented in a comment on CPAC by Flipmoo which was that there was ‘no interview of ACP’, but Zing quickly explained that ACP’s owners were unresponsive to his requests to interview them. It’s ACP’s fault really…

—-

I’d also really like to take this opportunity to explain that Nachos SS are a completely separate entity to the Nachos, led by completely different people to the Nachos and thus the Nachos have very little control over what they are doing. If they decide to declare a separate war on ACP that is an issue between the Nachos SS and ACP, and has very little to do with the Nachos. 

From Bam’s post

Also, can we discuss Bam’s awful grammar? ‘Biasm’ sounds very very dodgy.

So Bam can you please do us a favour and simmer down your anger over what’s effectively a non issue ❤

thanx  bbz bff4lyf 2k14,

Chrisi Blule

I don’t even know what I am any more. 

Filed under: The Nacho Army |